![]() ![]() However, over the past 20 years, there has been broad recognition of the need to differentiate between different types of narcissism that can be roughly divided into narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic vulnerability. ĭespite numerous studies on narcissism, no consensus has been reached on a widely accepted definition of narcissism. In the current study, we hence proposed and tested a theory -driven model that focuses on the interplay between narcissism, identity integration, and self-control, in the explanation of criminal behavior. However, most of the existing studies on personality characteristics and abilities that contribute to the development of criminal behavior have focused on single factors in relation to offending, and integration among studies has often occurred post-hoc via logical inferences (e.g., because construct X is related to construct Y, which in turn is related to criminal behavior, an indirect effect can be logically expected). The antecedents of criminality have long been of interest to criminological researchers, as well as factors that mediate the links between them (e.g., ). We propose that both subtypes of narcissism should be carefully considered in clinical assessment and current intervention practices. Finally, self-control was, in turn, negatively related to criminal behavior. However, identity integration did not have a direct significant effect on criminal behavior, but it was indirectly and negatively associated with criminal behavior via self-control. Moreover, grandiose narcissism was positively, whereas vulnerable narcissism was negatively associated with identity integration. In contrast, vulnerable narcissism did not have a direct significant effect on criminal behavior, but it was indirectly and positively associated with criminal behavior via identity integration and self-control. Grandiose narcissism negatively predicted criminal behavior above and beyond the influence of identity integration and self-control. The overall SEM model yielded good fit indices. Criminal behavior was a grouping variable used as a categorical outcome, whereas self-report questionnaires were used to assess grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, self-control, and identity integration. The total sample ( N = 222) included 65 (29.3%) individuals convicted of criminal behavior and 157 (70.7%) participants from the community, with a mean age of 37.71 years ( SD = 13.25). Therefore, the present study aimed to develop a theory-driven hypothetical model that investigates the complex associations between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, identity integration, self-control, and criminal behavior using structural equation modeling (SEM). ![]() In addition, there is some evidence suggesting that identity integration and self-control may underlie this association. Although systematic research on narcissism has been conducted for over 100 years, researchers have only recently started to distinguish between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism in relation to criminal behavior. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |